Frailty is a better predictor than age for outcomes in geriatric patients with rectal cancer undergoing proctectomy.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 32665144.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2020.05.027.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Both frailty and older age are risk factors for adverse surgical outcomes. We hypothesized that frailty, regardless of patient age, is a predictor of poor postoperative outcome among patients with rectal cancer undergoing proctectomy. Patients with primary rectal cancer undergoing proctectomy between 2012 to 2015 were identified in the database of the National Quality Improvement Program. The simplified, 5-item frailty index was grouped into 0, 1, 2, and ≥3. Outcomes were morbidity and 30-day mortality. This study involved 9,252 patients from the National Quality Improvement Program database. Increasingly frail patients had greater morbidity and mortality (P < .001). Logistic regression revealed that frailty was a predictor of morbidity (odds ratio = 6.7, P < .0001); in contrast, older age was not associated with morbidity when adjusting for frailty (odds ratio = 1.2, P = .14). Both older age and frailty were associated with greater mortality, with frailty (odds ratio = 20.8, P < .0001) more so than older age (odds ratio = 10.3, P < .0001). Frailty was more strongly associated with morbidity and mortality than older age in patients undergoing proctectomy. Surgical options can be expanded to older patients with the use of simplified, 5-item frailty index as a decision-making tool.
Medical subject headings
- Frailty
- Geriatric Assessment
- Postoperative Complications
- Proctectomy
- Rectal Neoplasms