Head-to-Head Evaluation of <sup>18</sup>F-FES and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in Metastatic Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer.

Ulaner, Gary A; Jhaveri, Komal; Chandarlapaty, Sarat; Hatzoglou, Vaios; Riedl, Christopher C; Lewis, Jason S; Mauguen, Audrey · J Nucl Med · 2021

Where this comes from

Abstract

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) demonstrates lower conspicuity on <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET than the more common invasive ductal carcinoma. Other molecular imaging methods may be needed for evaluation of this malignancy. As ILC is nearly always (95%) estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, ER-targeting PET tracers such as 16α-<sup>18</sup>F-fluoroestradiol (<sup>18</sup>F-FES) may have value. We reviewed prospective trials at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center using <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT to evaluate metastatic ILC patients with synchronous <sup>18</sup>F-FDG and <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT imaging, which allowed a head-to-head comparison of these 2 PET tracers. <b>Methods:</b> Six prospective clinical trials using <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT in patients with metastatic breast cancer were performed at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from 2008 to 2019. These trials included 92 patients, of whom 14 (15%) were of ILC histology. Seven of 14 patients with ILC had <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT performed within 5 wk of the research <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT and no intervening change in management. For these 7 patients, the <sup>18</sup>F-FES and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT studies were analyzed to determine the total number of tracer-avid lesions, organ systems of involvement, and SUV<sub>max</sub> of each organ system for both tracers. <b>Results:</b> In the 7 comparable pairs of scans, there were a total of 254 <sup>18</sup>F-FES-avid lesions (SUV<sub>max</sub>, 2.6-17.9) and 111 <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-avid lesions (SUV<sub>max</sub>, 3.3-9.9) suggestive of malignancy. For 5 of 7 (71%) ILC patients, <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT detected more metastatic lesions than <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT. In the same 5 of 7 patients, the SUV<sub>max</sub> of <sup>18</sup>F-FES-avid lesions was greater than the SUV<sub>max</sub> of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-avid lesions. One patient had <sup>18</sup>F-FES-avid metastases with no corresponding <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-avid metastases. There were no patients with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-avid distant metastases without <sup>18</sup>F-FES-avid distant metastases, although in one patient liver metastases were evident on <sup>18</sup>F-FDG but not on <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET. <b>Conclusion:</b><sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT compared favorably with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT for detection of metastases in patients with metastatic ILC. Larger prospective trials of <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT in ILC should be considered to evaluate ER-targeted imaging for clinical value in patients with this histology of breast cancer.

Medical subject headings