Revisiting prosthesis choice in mitral valve replacement in children: Durable alternatives to traditional bioprostheses.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 32713632.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.04.173.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To determine risk factors for re-replacement and death or transplant following mitral valve replacement (MVR) in children METHODS: This is a retrospective 26-year review of patients younger than 20 years of age undergoing MVR between 1992 and 2018 at single institution. Outcomes included freedom from re-MVR and transplant-free survival. Cox proportional hazards regression models assessed association between outcomes and potential risk factors. At median age 4.2 years, 190 children underwent 290 MVR: 180 mechanical, 63 porcine, 13 pericardial, and 34 stented bovine jugular vein valves. Re-MVR occurred in 100 valves. Freedom from re-MVR at 5 and 10 years was 76% and 44%. Times to re-MVR were associated with prosthesis type (P < .001), with porcine and pericardial valves at greatest risk. Other risk factors for prosthetic failure included smaller prosthesis size and left ventricular hypoplasia. There were 9 transplants and 44 deaths. Transplant-free survival at 5 and 10 years was 81% and 76%. Prosthesis type was significantly associated with time to death/transplant in univariate analysis only (P = .021), with porcine at greater risk than mechanical. Independent risk factors for death/transplant included larger indexed geometric orifice area and longer bypass time. In pediatric patients undergoing MVR, mechanical and stented bovine jugular vein valves were associated with increased durability compared with fixed-diameter bioprosthetic alternatives.