Conducting Goals-of-Care Discussions Takes Less Time Than Imagined.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 32749930.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1200/JOP.19.00743.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To describe the length of encounter during visits where goals-of-care (GoC) discussions were expected to take place. Oncologists from community, academic, municipal, and rural hospitals were randomly assigned to receive a coaching model of communication skills to facilitate GoC discussions with patients with newly diagnosed advanced solid-tumor cancer with a prognosis of < 2 years. Patients were surveyed after the first restaging visit regarding the quality of the GoC discussion on a scale of 0-10 (0 = worst; 10 = best), with ≥ 8 indicating a high-quality GoC discussion. Visits were audiotaped, and total encounter time was measured. The median face-to-face time oncologists spent during a GoC discussion was 15 minutes (range, 10-20 minutes). Among the different hospital types, there was no significant difference in encounter time. There was no difference in the length of the encounter whether a high-quality GoC discussion took place or not (15 <i>v</i> 14 minutes; <i>P</i> = .9). If there was imaging evidence of cancer progression, the median encounter time was 18 minutes compared with 13 minutes for no progression (<i>P</i> = .03). In a multivariate model, oncologist productivity, patient age, and Medicare coverage affected duration of the encounter. Oncologists can complete high-quality GoC discussions in 15 minutes. These data refute the common misperception that discussing such matters with patients with advanced cancer requires significant time.
Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms
- Oncologists