SARS-CoV-2 and ACE2: The biology and clinical data settling the ARB and ACEI controversy.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 32771682.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102907 and PMC identifier 7415847.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-ND.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 enters cells by binding of its spike protein to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) have been reported to increase ACE2 expression in animal models, and worse outcomes are reported in patients with co-morbidities commonly treated with these agents, leading to controversy during the COVID-19 pandemic over whether these drugs might be helpful or harmful. Animal, in vitro and clinical data relevant to the biology of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), its interaction with the kallikrein-kinin system (KKS) and SARS-CoV-2, and clinical studies were reviewed. SARS-CoV-2 hijacks ACE2to invade and damage cells, downregulating ACE2, reducing its protective effects and exacerbating injurious Ang II effects. However, retrospective observational studies do not show higher risk of infection with ACEI or ARB use. Nevertheless, study of the RAS and KKS in the setting of coronaviral infection may yield therapeutic targets.
Medical subject headings
- Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
- Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
- Coronavirus Infections
- Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A
- Pneumonia, Viral