Outcomes of type Ia endoleaks after endovascular repair of the proximal aorta.
case_series · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 32773121.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.06.026.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) can be complicated by a type Ia endoleak. However, its natural history remains unclear. This report describes the natural history and midterm outcome of conservatively treated type Ia endoleaks in the proximal aorta. Between 2007 and 2015, 395 patients underwent TEVAR at our institution. Only TEVARs landing proximally at landing zones 0, 1, and 2 were included (221/395). Type Ia endoleak's flow was classified as "fast" or "slow" based on the time needed to visualize the aneurysmal sac during arteriogram. The median follow-up was 4.1 years. Aortic dissection, thoracic aortic aneurysm, and traumatic aortic injury were the most common indications for TEVAR; the incidence of type Ia endoleak was not statistically different. Forty-seven patients (21.3%) had a type Ia endoleak. TEVAR landing proximally at zone 1 increased the odds of developing a type Ia endoleak (odds ratio, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-5.9; P = .0072). The 30-day mortality and the overall survival was not influenced by the development of immediate-type Ia endoleak. In 34 (72.3%) patients, the endoleak resolved spontaneously. Ninety-four percent of these patients had a SlowE (n = 32/34). All of spontaneous resolutions occurred before the end of the first postoperative year. SlowE tends to resolve within 1 year after TEVAR. Initial conservative treatment seems to be a reasonable approach in patients with SlowE.
Medical subject headings
- Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation
- Endovascular Procedures