Social and behavioral consequences of mask policies during the COVID-19 pandemic.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 32820078.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1073/pnas.2011674117 and PMC identifier 7486713.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Mandatory and voluntary mask policies may have yet unknown social and behavioral consequences related to the effectiveness of the measure, stigmatization, and perceived fairness. Serial cross-sectional data (April 14 to May 26, 2020) from nearly 7,000 German participants demonstrate that implementing a mandatory policy increased actual compliance despite moderate acceptance; mask wearing correlated positively with other protective behaviors. A preregistered experiment (<i>n</i> = 925) further indicates that a voluntary policy would likely lead to insufficient compliance, would be perceived as less fair, and could intensify stigmatization. A mandatory policy appears to be an effective, fair, and socially responsible solution to curb transmissions of airborne viruses.
Medical subject headings
- Coronavirus Infections
- Masks
- Pandemics
- Pneumonia, Viral
- Public Health Administration