Continent diversion: five decades of developments and evolution.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 32916771.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1111/bju.15239.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To provide a chronological overview of the evolution of continent urinary diversion (CUD) over the last 50 years and to highlight important milestones. We performed an extensive literature review and analysed different forms of urinary diversion worldwide. After the evaluation of surgical techniques, we assessed the advantages and disadvantages of assorted CUD approaches based on published long-term follow-up data. A wide variety of surgical options for CUD is available and feasible to date, although consensus among urologists regarding the 'gold standard' is still lacking. Several forms of orthotopic bladder substitutes and continent cutaneous urinary reservoirs have been shown to provide excellent long-term results. The last 50 years of CUD have seen constant evolution and refinement of techniques, but the best surgical approach remains unclear and there is no 'one-size-fits-all' option, but rather tailor-made approaches are necessary to ensure patient satisfaction.
Medical subject headings
- Urinary Bladder
- Urinary Diversion
- Urinary Reservoirs, Continent