Identification of PCWG3 Target Populations Is More Accurate and Reproducible with PSMA PET Than with Conventional Imaging: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 32917782.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2967/jnumed.120.246603.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-ligand PET is potentially useful for screening of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) clinical trial target populations. We investigated the impact of PSMA PET on Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 (PCWG3) clinical subtype classification when compared with conventional imaging (CI). <b>Methods:</b> A multicenter retrospective study enrolled patients who had undergone PSMA PET for CRPC, had prostate-specific antigen values of at least 1 ng/mL, and had undergone CI-that is, CT plus bone scanning or whole-body MRI. The clinical PCWG3 subtype was determined for PET versus CI by 3 masked readers. <b>Results:</b> Sixty-seven patients were included, and PSMA PET led to up-staging in 15% (10/67) of patients; of these, 6 of 10 (60%) had nonmetastatic CRPC on CI. PSMA PET resulted in down-staging in 15% (10/67) of patients. Agreement for PET versus CI PCWG3 clinical subtypes was 0.81 versus 0.51, 0.74 versus 0.47, 0.95 versus 0.72, or 0.59 versus 0.66 for local, nodal, bone, or visceral disease, respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> Despite 70% concordance with CI, PSMA PET demonstrated superior reproducibility and accuracy especially for non-metastatic CRPC and should be implemented in future clinical trial entry procedures.
Medical subject headings
- Antigens, Surface
- Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II
- Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography