Surgical Techniques in Management of Supravalvular Aortic Stenosis in Children.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 32946844.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.06.118.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Multiple techniques exist for the repair of supravalvular aortic stenosis (SVAS), but given the lesion's rarity, analyses comparing the efficacy of each repair have been limited. A retrospective review of all children at a single institution who underwent repair of SVAS from June 1995 to May 2019 was performed. Anatomic and physiologic measurements across time points were compared between 2 predominant surgical techniques. Time-to-event outcomes were compared using the log-rank test. SVAS was repaired in 89 patients, by using a single-patch in 31 (35%) and the Doty repair in 58 (65%). Median age at operation was 2.5 years (interquartile range [IQR], 1.0 to 6.8 years), with median follow-up of 5.8 years (IQR, 1.8 to 10.7 years). Reoperation was required in 8 (9%) patients at a median of 1.5 years postoperatively (IQR, 0.3 to 4.8 years). There was 1 death after multiple reinterventions. The change from the preoperative to the postoperative sinotubular junction z-score was greater for patients after Doty repair (median change +2.5; IQR, 1.5, 4.1) than for patients after single-patch repair (median change +0.8; IQR, -0.1, 2.1; P = .001). Freedom from reoperation was longer for patients after Doty repair than after the single-patch technique (P = .008). The Doty repair provides longer freedom from reoperation after supravalvular aortic stenosis repair compared with a single-patch technique, likely through a greater increase in the sinotubular junction at the time of initial operation.
Medical subject headings
- Aortic Stenosis, Supravalvular
- Postoperative Complications