Dual-energy CT arthrography: a feasibility study.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 32948903.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00256-020-03603-9.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To evaluate the feasibility of producing 2-dimensional (2D) virtual noncontrast images and 3-dimensional (3D) bone models from dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) arthrograms and to determine whether this is best accomplished using 190 keV virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) or virtual unenhanced (VUE) images. VMI and VUE images were retrospectively reconstructed from patients with internal derangement of the shoulder or knee joint who underwent DECT arthrography between September 2017 and August 2019. A region of interest was placed in the area of brightest contrast, and the mean attenuation (in Hounsfield units [HUs]) was recorded. Two blinded musculoskeletal radiologists qualitatively graded the 2D images and 3D models using scores ranging from 0 to 3 (0 considered optimal). Twenty-six patients (mean age ± SD, 57.5 ± 16.8 years; 6 women) were included in the study. The contrast attenuation on VUE images (overall mean ± SD, 10.5 ± 16.4 HU; knee, 19.3 ± 10.7 HU; shoulder, 5.0 ± 17.2 HU) was significantly lower (p < 0.001 for all comparisons) than on VMI (overall mean ± SD, 107.7 ± 43.8 HU; knee, 104.6 ± 31.1 HU; shoulder, 109.6 ± 51.0 HU). The proportion of cases with optimal scores (0 or 1) was significantly higher with VUE than with VMI for both 2D and 3D images (p < 0.001). DECT arthrography can be used to produce 2D virtual noncontrast images and to generate 3D bone models. The VUE technique is superior to VMI in producing virtual noncontrast images.
Medical subject headings
- Arthrography
- Radiography, Dual-Energy Scanned Projection