Practitioner Engagement in Activities of the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN): 7-Year Results.

Mungia, Rahma; Funkhouser, Ellen; Makhija, Sonia K; Reyes, Stephanie C; Cohen, Rachel A; Cochran, David L; Meyerowitz, Cyril; Rindal, D Brad et al. · J Am Board Fam Med · 2020

retrospective_cohort · Level III

Where this comes from

Abstract

To 1) quantify practitioner activities of the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network (Network) for which Continuing Education (CE) credits were received (study training, videos, webinars, meetings, and symposia); 2) quantify practitioner coauthoring Network publications and presentations; and 3) test whether practitioner characteristics were associated with participation in these activities. A retrospective analysis of 4361 practitioners who enrolled in the Network between April 12, 2012 and October 12, 2018. Overall, 59% (n = 2586) of practitioners earned CE credit from the Network; among these, 68% (n = 1757) from a video, 38% (n = 993) attended an annual Network meeting, 31% (n = 798) due to training for a Network clinical study, 9% (n = 226) attended a national symposium, and 7% (n = 170) participated in a Network webinar. Members of 2 large group practices earned on average more CEs than practitioners from other practice settings. Four percent (n = 159) of practitioners coauthored a Network presentation or publication. Practitioners who received their dental degree before 2000, were general practitioners, or were members of 2 large group practices, were more likely to have coauthored a publication or presentation. This Network used a broad range of activities to engage community practitioners. These activities were successful in sustaining a high level of practitioner engagement in clinical research and its relevance to everyday clinical practice.

Medical subject headings