Thermal Ablation Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy After Transarterial Chemoembolization for Inoperable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis.

Nabavizadeh, Nima; Jahangiri, Younes; Rahmani, Ramtin; Tomozawa, Yuki; Geeratikun, Yindee; Chen, Yiyi; Hung, Arthur; Degnin, Catherine et al. · AJR Am J Roentgenol · 2021

retrospective_cohort · Level III

Where this comes from

Abstract

<b>BACKGROUND.</b> Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has synergistic properties when combined with ablative therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). <b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of our study was to compare outcomes for inoperable HCC between TACE with percutaneous thermal ablation (TACE-TA) and TACE with stereotactic body radiotherapy (TACE-SBRT) using propensity score-weighted cohorts. <b>METHODS.</b> This retrospective study included 190 patients with a single inoperable HCC treated from 2007 to 2018 by either TACE-SBRT (<i>n</i> = 90) or TACE-TA (<i>n</i> = 100). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) and hepatotoxicity (defined as Child-Pugh score elevation of ≥ 2 within 2-6 months after treatment). Fine-Gray competing risk models with propensity score weighting and transplant as the competing risk factor were used to model OS and PFS. <b>RESULTS.</b> The median follow-up time was 48.2 months. Both OS and PFS were significantly higher for TACE-TA (77% and 76%, respectively, at 2 years) than TACE-SBRT (49% and 50%, respectively, at 2 years) in the propensity score-weighted multivariate model (OS: subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] = 2.70, <i>p</i> < .001; PFS: sHR = 1.71, <i>p</i> = .02). Treatment-related hepatotoxicity occurred in 9% of patients who underwent TACE-TA versus 27% of those who underwent TACE-SBRT (<i>p</i> = .01). For the subset of patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer A HCC and Child-Pugh A cirrhosis (TACE-SBRT, <i>n</i> = 36 patients; TACE-TA, <i>n</i> = 55 patients), OS (<i>p</i> = .11) and PFS (<i>p</i> = .19) were not significantly different between the two treatment modalities. <b>CONCLUSION.</b> Compared with TACE-SBRT, TACE-TA showed superior OS and PFS, possibly from its lesser hepatotoxicity. The two strategies did not differ in OS and PFS for patients with the earliest-stage HCC and preserved liver function. <b>CLINICAL IMPACT.</b> Across all patients, TACE-TA may be superior to TACE-SBRT for inoperable HCC.

Medical subject headings