Prognostic Value of 16α-<sup>18</sup>F-Fluoro-17β-Estradiol PET as a Predictor of Disease Outcome in Endometrial Cancer: A Prospective Study.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 33008930.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2967/jnumed.120.244319 and PMC identifier 8844258.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential of 16α-<sup>18</sup>F-fluoro-17β-estradiol (<sup>18</sup>F-FES) PET to predict prognosis in patients with endometrial cancer (EC). <b>Methods:</b> In total, 67 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I-IV EC underwent <sup>18</sup>F-FES and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT before treatment. The SUV<sub>mean</sub> of the primary tumor was compared with the clinical characteristics, and the relationships between SUV and progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival were analyzed. <b>Results:</b><sup>18</sup>F-FES SUV was significantly associated with stage, histology, lymphovascular space involvement (LVSI), and lymph node metastasis, and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG SUV was significantly associated with stage, myometrial invasion, tumor size, and lymph node metastasis. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that <sup>18</sup>F-FES SUV could significantly detect tumor progression and survival, with areas under the curve of 0.813 and 0.790, respectively, whereas <sup>18</sup>F-FDG SUV could detect them with areas under the curve of 0.557 and 0.635, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that patients with a low <sup>18</sup>F-FES SUV had significantly poor PFS (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and overall survival (<i>P</i> = 0.001) compared with patients with a high SUV, whereas <sup>18</sup>F-FDG showed no significant differences. In a subanalysis of 27 patients with a low risk of recurrence (FIGO stage IA endometrioid carcinoma [grade 1 or 2] without LVSI), those with a low <sup>18</sup>F-FES SUV also had poorer PFS than those with a high SUV (<i>P</i> = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, an <sup>18</sup>F-FES SUV of less than 2.63 (<i>P =</i> 0.037; hazard ratio, 10.727; 95% CI, 1.16-99.35) and FIGO stages III and IV (<i>P =</i> 0.042; hazard ratio, 8.838; 95% CI, 1.09-71.84) were significantly associated with PFS. <b>Conclusion:</b> A low <sup>18</sup>F-FES for the primary tumor was strongly associated with prognostic factors of EC such as LVSI and lymph node metastasis, and a low <sup>18</sup>F-FES SUV was an independent prognostic factor for PFS in patients with EC. These data suggest that pretreatment <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET might be useful in determining the appropriate treatment for patients with EC.
Medical subject headings
- Endometrial Neoplasms
- Estradiol
- Positron-Emission Tomography