Optimal <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA and <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA PET window levelling for gross tumour volume delineation in primary prostate cancer.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 33025093.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00259-020-05059-4.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This study proposes optimal tracer-specific threshold-based window levels for PSMA PET-based intraprostatic gross tumour volume (GTV) contouring to reduce interobserver delineation variability. Nine <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 and nine <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 PET scans including GTV delineations of four expert teams (GTV<sub>manual</sub>) and a majority-voted GTV (GTV<sub>majority</sub>) were assessed with respect to a registered histopathological GTV (GTV<sub>histo</sub>) as the gold standard reference. The standard uptake values (SUVs) per voxel were converted to a percentage (SUV%) relative to the SUV<sub>max</sub>. The statistically optimised SUV% threshold (SOST) was defined as those that maximises accuracy for threshold-based contouring. A leave-one-out cross-validation receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the SOST for each tracer. The SOST analysis was performed twice, first using the GTV<sub>histo</sub> contour as training structure (GTV<sub>SOST-H</sub>) and second using the GTV<sub>majority</sub> contour as training structure (GTV<sub>SOST-MA</sub>) to correct for any limited misregistration. The accuracy of both GTV<sub>SOST-H</sub> and GTV<sub>SOST-MA</sub> was calculated relative to GTV<sub>histo</sub> in the 'leave-one-out' patient of each fold and compared with the accuracy of GTV<sub>manual</sub>. ROC curve analysis for <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET revealed a median threshold of 25 SUV% (range, 22-27 SUV%) and 41 SUV% (40-43 SUV%) for GTV<sub>SOST-H</sub> and GTV<sub>SOST-MA</sub>, respectively. For <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 PET, a median threshold of 42 SUV% (39-45 SUV%) for GTV<sub>SOST-H</sub> and 44 SUV% (42-45 SUV%) for GTV<sub>SOST-MA</sub> was found. A significant pairwise difference was observed when comparing the accuracy of the GTV<sub>SOST-H</sub> contours with the median accuracy of the GTV<sub>manual</sub> contours (median, - 2.5%; IQR, - 26.5-0.2%; p = 0.020), whereas no significant pairwise difference was found for the GTV<sub>SOST-MA</sub> contours (median, - 0.3%; IQR, - 4.4-0.6%; p = 0.199). Threshold-based contouring using GTV<sub>majority</sub>-trained SOSTs achieves an accuracy comparable with manual contours in delineating GTV<sub>histo</sub>. The median SOSTs of 41 SUV% for <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET and 44 SUV% for <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 PET form a base for tracer-specific window levelling. Clinicaltrials.gov ; NCT03327675; 31-10-2017.
Medical subject headings
- Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
- Prostatic Neoplasms