Reconstruction of infected post-traumatic bone defects of the distal femur with the Compress^Ⓡ implant. Preliminary results of a staged non-biological strategy.

Abstract

Infected post-traumatic distal femur defects remain a therapeutic challenge. Non-biological reconstruction offers an option for avoiding complex biological knee arthrodesis procedures. The Compress^Ⓡ implant is an alternative to the traditional distal femur stemmed megaprosthesis. The aim of this study is to analyse the first patients treated with a distal femur Compress^Ⓡ prosthesis to manage massive infected post-traumatic defects of the distal femur with joint involvement. We retrospectively reviewed all patients with massive infected defects of the distal femur where this implant was used in a two-stage strategy, together with an antibacterial coating hydrogel (DAC^Ⓡ). The specific protocol, microbiological data, clinical and radiological results, complications, functional results and prosthesis survivorship were determined. Follow-up was for a minimum of 12 months, or until implant removal. Ten patients (11 Compress^Ⓡ implants) with a mean age of 52 years (range 35-73) were included. On average, patients had undergone 4.4 previous surgical procedures before index surgery. The mean bone defect was 14 cm (range 8-21). After a median follow-up of 27 months (range 12-50 months) no patient had presented with recurrence of the infection, and limb salvage was achieved in all cases. Two patients suffered aseptic loosening which required revision of the femoral component. The short-term survivorship of the implant in our series was 81.8% at 4 years, with all failures occurring in the first 7 months. After this 7-month time threshold, we encountered no further loosening. Regarding functional outcomes, patients had a mean knee ROM of -4/86, expressed high overall satisfaction with the procedure according to the SAPS scale, and had an average LEFS of 52.5% (40-72.5%). Non-biological reconstruction of the distal femur with the Compress^Ⓡ implant is a valid option in selected patients with massive infected defects with joint involvement. Survivorship was high, with all loosening occurring in the first months after surgery-representing a failure in the osseointegration of the implant.