Does correctional supervision of amphetamine users reduce the risk of re-offending?
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 33067834.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1111/add.15298.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To examine the specific deterrent effect of offender supervision on the risk of a further offence by persons convicted of amphetamine use and/or possession. Observational study of two groups matched on a wide range of factors using augmented inverse probability of treatment weighting. New South Wales (NSW), Australia. A total of 2099 persons convicted of amphetamine use and/or possession and placed on either a supervised good behaviour bond (1004) or a bond without supervision (1096). Conviction for another amphetamine use/possession offence, any drug offence, assault or theft within 48 months free time after the index court appearance. Only two of the treatment estimates were consistent with a deterrent effect. Where the outcome was an assault offence, the estimated reduction in risk of re-offending was 1%. Where the outcome was a theft offence, the estimated reduction in the risk of reoffending was 0.07%. Neither result was statistically significant. The coefficients measuring the effect of supervision on the remaining two outcomes (use/possess amphetamine and use/possess any drug) were both positive and not statistically significant. Correctional supervision does not appear to have been effective in New South Wales, Australia, in reducing the risk of reoffending among people convicted of amphetamine use/possession.
Medical subject headings
- Amphetamine-Related Disorders
- Criminals