Does Size Matter for Cephalomedullary Nails in Geriatric Intertrochanteric Fractures?
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 33079832.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001989.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To evaluate the need for reoperation of geriatric intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with 10-mm cephalomedullary nails versus those treated with nails larger than 10 mm. Retrospective review at a single institution. Level I trauma center. All patients age 60 and over treated with cephalomedullary fixation for an intertrochanteric femur fracture at a single institution. Cephalomedullary fixation with variable nail diameters. Reoperation rates of geriatric intertrochanteric fractures treated with a size 10-mm diameter cephalomedullary nail compared with patients treated with nails larger than 10 mm. There were no significant differences in reoperation rates when the 10-mm cohort was compared with an aggregate cohort of all nails larger than 10 mm (P = 0.99). This result was true for both all-cause reoperation and noninfectious reoperation. There was no difference between cohorts in regards to age, gender, or fracture pattern. A 10-mm cephalomedullary nail can be used in lieu of a larger diameter fixation in patients age 60 and older with intertrochanteric femur fractures while still maintaining a comparable rate of reoperation. Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Medical subject headings
- Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary
- Hip Fractures
Anatomy
- hip