Is mini-open intramedullary nailing an effective intervention for adult femoral diaphyseal fractures in odd hours? A prospective case-control functional outcome and radiation safety study.
case_control · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 33153711.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.097.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Closed intramedullary (IM) nailing among various modalities is one of the commonest sought out procedure in current practice for management of femoral-diaphyseal fractures (FDF) following trauma. However, it has some limitations like prolonged procedural duration, high radiation exposure and a steep learning curve. Therefore, with limited resources in odd hours and at a high patient turnover center where closed reduction can be a challenge, we adopted a modified mini-open technique which can overcome the limitations of closed reduction technique. To compare the closed IM nailing and mini-open technique in FDF in terms of radiation exposure, surgical duration, radiological and functional outcome. A total of 100 patients (118 femurs) with FDF (AO 32A1-B2) operated in odd-hours (20:00-06:00 hrs. GMT +5.30) with closed (Group I, n=62) or mini-open (Group II, n=56) IM nailing technique between September 2018 to December 2019 with a minimum follow up of 12 months were included in this study. The functional outcomes were measured using Thoresen scoring system and statistical analysis were performed using paired t-test and χ2 -test. The overall mean patient age was 33.5 years (18-74 years). The mean surgical duration, c-arm shoots for reduction and radiological union time were 71.5 minutes, 21 shoots and 16 weeks, respectively for group I and 47.5 minutes, 9.4 shoots and 18 weeks for group II. There was significant difference between the two groups in mean surgical duration (p<0.05) and c-arm shoots (p<0.05). However, there was no statistical significant difference between time for union, rate of union, functional results and incidence of superficial or deep infection between the two groups. In conclusion, mini-open technique is a safer alternative in patients with FDF at high-volume centers and in odd-hours when the available resources are limited.
Medical subject headings
- Femoral Fractures
- Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary