Interim PET in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 33246974.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2967/jnumed.120.255034.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, early assessment of treatment response by <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET may trigger treatment modification. Reliable identification of good and poor responders is important. We compared 3 competing methods of interim PET evaluation. <b>Methods:</b> Images from 449 patients participating in the "PET-Guided Therapy of Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas" trial were reanalyzed by applying the visual Deauville score and the SUV-based qPET (q = quantitative) and ΔSUV<sub>max</sub> scales to interim PET scans performed after 2 cycles of chemotherapy. qPET relates residual lymphoma <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake to physiologic liver uptake, converting the ordinal Deauville scale into a continuous scale and permitting a direct comparison with the continuous ΔSUV<sub>max</sub> scale, which is based on SUV<sub>max</sub> changes between baseline and interim scans. Positive and negative predictive values were calculated for progression-free survival. <b>Results:</b> When established thresholds were used to distinguish between good and poor responders (visual Deauville score 1-3 vs. 4-5; ΔSUV<sub>max</sub> > 66% vs. ≤ 66%), the positive predictive value was significantly lower with Deauville than ΔSUV<sub>max</sub> (38.4% vs. 56.6%; <i>P</i> = 0.03). qPET and ΔSUV<sub>max</sub> were strongly correlated on the log scale (Pearson <i>r</i> = 0.75). When plotted along corresponding percentiles, the positive predictive value curves for qPET and ΔSUV<sub>max</sub> were superimposable, with low values up to the 85th percentile and a steep rise thereafter. The recommended threshold of 66% SUV<sub>max</sub> reduction for the identification of poor responders was equivalent to qPET = 2.26, corresponding to score 5 on the visual Deauville scale. The negative predictive value curves were also superimposable but remained flat between 80% and 70%. <b>Conclusion:</b> Continuous scales are better suited for interim PET-based outcome prediction than the ordinal Deauville scale. qPET and ΔSUV<sub>max</sub> essentially carry the same information. The proportion of poor-risk patients identified is less than 15%.
Medical subject headings
- Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse
- Positron-Emission Tomography
- Fluorodeoxyglucose F18