Outcomes of Carotid Artery Replacement With Total Arch Reconstruction for Type A Aortic Dissection.

Abstract

Cerebral malperfusion and carotid artery dissection in patients with acute type A aortic dissections (TAAD) carry high morbidity and mortality. There are limited data on outcomes of concomitant carotid artery replacement with total arch replacement in the setting of TAAD. All patients with acute TAAD who underwent a total arch replacement between 2007 and 2018 were included. Data were retrospectively collected from a prospectively maintained database. Baselines variables were compared, and Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for long-term survival. Cox multivariable regression analysis was used to identify predictors of mortality. A total of 161 patients underwent total arch replacement for acute TAAD. Of these, 111 underwent conventional total arch reconstruction, and 50 had a concomitant carotid artery replacement. Baseline characteristics were similar between both cohorts apart from the carotid replacement cohort having a higher rate of preoperative cerebral malperfusion (48% vs 10.81%, P < .01) and preoperative stroke (28% vs 11.71%, P = .02). There was no difference in (operative) 30-day mortality between the carotid replacement and conventional total arch replacement groups (22% vs 18.9%, P = .81), 1-year mortality (28% vs 27.9%, P = .99), or 5-year mortality (32% vs 29.7%, P = .917). Postoperative stroke was 0% vs 4.5% (P = .301) for the carotid vs conventional total arch replacement cohort. Concomitant carotid artery replacement is a feasible and safe technique to address perioperative cerebral malperfusion, carotid dissection, and neurologic dysfunction associated with carotid artery dissection, with no difference in long-term survival or postoperative stroke when compared with conventional total arch replacement.