Modernizing the Otolaryngology Referral Workflow: The Impact of Electronic Consultation.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 33320360.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/lary.29333.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To determine the impact of electronic consultation on the otolaryngology clinic workflow at our high-volume public hospital. Retrospective Observational Study. This is a retrospective observational analysis study. Operational data regarding clinic volume, referral patterns, and scheduling efficiency were assessed over a 9-month period in 2018 prior to implementation of electronic consultation. The same data were collected for the 9-month period immediately following implementation of electronic consultation in 2019. During the pre-implementation (pre-EC) period, 3,243 otolaryngology referrals were made as compared to 4,249 post-implementation (post-EC). 86% of referrals were scheduled for a clinic appointment pre-EC, compared to 61% post-EC (P < .00001) 24.5% of patients were evaluated within 30 days pre-EC compared to 53.6% post-EC (P < .00001). The average time to be seen by an otolaryngology provider declined from 60.8 days pre-EC to 42.8 days post-EC (P = .0029). There was a 50% decline in the percentage of appointments canceled by patients in the post-EC period as compared to pre-EC. In our experience, implementation of electronic consultation significantly reduced both wait times for a clinic appointment and the percentage of no-show or canceled appointments. Electronic consultation may be a valuable tool in improving the efficiency and yield of the modern otolaryngology clinic. 4 Laryngoscope, 131:E1792-E1796, 2021.
Medical subject headings
- Efficiency, Organizational
- Otolaryngology
- Remote Consultation
- Workflow