Effect of Surgeon Experience on Surgical Outcome of 80-Year-Old or Older Intracranial Meningioma Patients.

Abstract

Previous reports suggest that more experienced surgeons have better postoperative outcomes in neurosurgery. We studied whether this association is found in a fragile cohort of ≥80-year-old intracranial meningioma (IM) patients. We identified 83 very old IM patients who were operated on by 12 different surgeons between 2010 and 2018. Besides general patient- and tumor-related characteristics, we collected information about the surgeons' case volume and length of surgical career (LSC). We classified neurosurgeons into 3 different categories: 1) low-volume (8 surgeons; 1-4 operations per surgeon); 2) moderate-volume (3 surgeons; 8-12 operations per surgeon); and 3) high-volume (1 reference surgeon; 37 operations). We calculated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals for 1-year mortality and 3-month independency (capability to live at home) by surgeon volume categories and per 5-year increase of LSC. We found no significant differences in any preoperative characteristics between the surgeon volume categories. IM patients operated on by low-volume surgeons had the lowest risk of first-year mortality (OR, 0.15 [0.01-2.05]) and the highest likelihood of living at home 3 months after surgery (OR, 12.61 [1.21-131.03]). Increasing LSC was associated with 1-year mortality (OR, 1.34 [1.03-1.73]) and with lower likelihood to live at home 3 months after surgery (OR, 0.83 [0.69-1.00]), but these associations were slightly nonsignificant after adjusting for IM patients' age, sex, and preoperative independency. In a high-volume academic hospital, less experienced neurosurgeons seem to achieve similar results as the more experienced neurosurgeons, even when operating on selected highly fragile meningioma patients.