Tandem ureteral stents drainage lowers renal pelvis pressure in malignant ureteral obstruction: Experimental and computational models.
biomechanical · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 33486265.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110237.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Malignant ureteral obstruction may lead to impaired renal function and requires drainage by a percutaneous nephrostomy tube or an internal ureteric stent. Usage of stiff tandem ureteral stents may decrease stent failure rates. In this paper we combined computational and in vitro models to examine the flow in a malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) managed by 4 methods of drainage: single soft stent, single stiff stent, soft tandem ureteral stents, and stiff tandem ureteral stents. Pressure at the renal pelvis was the primary outcome of the computational and in vitro models. Different drainage modalities were compared using ANCOVA. Results of computational and in vitro models agreed completely. Drainage by stiff tandem ureteral stents provides lower renal pelvis pressure levels compared with single and soft stents (p < 0.001), especially for high levels of external pressure. Usage of stiff tandem ureteral stents may decrease stent-failure rates and postpone the need for percutaneous nephrostomy tube insertion.
Medical subject headings
- Ureter
- Ureteral Obstruction