Attitudes Toward Euthanasia: A Longitudinal Analysis of the Role of Economic, Cultural, and Health-Related Factors.

Abstract

It is crucial that physicians understand differing attitudes toward euthanasia and which factors to consider when discussing end-of-life decisions with patients and families from diverse backgrounds. To investigate how attitudes toward euthanasia differ among countries, how they change, and how economic, religious, and health-related factors affect these attitudes. We analyzed attitudes toward euthanasia and economic, religious, and health-related indicators using longitudinal (1981-2018) World Values Survey (WVS) data. They included 62 countries with at least a 15-year, three-wave, time series (total n = 389,243 participants). Each national survey interviewed representative samples of adults (mean = 1405). In the latest wave, The Netherlands had the most favorable views of euthanasia (10-point scale with 1 = least justifiable: mean = 7.47) and Jordan the least (mean = 1.50). Residents of 23 of 24 high-income countries came to view euthanasia as more justifiable, while residents of 12 of 38 middle- and low-income countries came to view it as less justifiable over time. The higher GDP per-capita at the time of survey, the more euthanasia was accepted (r = 0.703; P< 0.0001); the more important respondents viewed religion as being, the less euthanasia was accepted (r = -0.834; P< 0.0001); the higher life expectancy and the lower infant mortality were, the more euthanasia was accepted (r = 0.669; P< 0.0001/r = -0.716; P< 0.0001). Euthanasia-related attitudes differ widely depending on the cultural context; changes over time varied in both directions; euthanasia-related attitudes were associated with economic, religious and health-related factors. With globalization increasing cultural diversity, these findings can inform physicians' communication about end-of-life decisions with patients and families from diverse backgrounds.