Penetrating Keratoplasty Versus Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty in Children and Adolescents With Keratoconus.

Abstract

To compare the outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) for pediatric keratoconus. Retrospective comparative interventional case series. This study included consecutive pediatric keratoconus cases (≤18 years of age) who received PK (n=45) or DALK (n=54) in 2 different time periods. Postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refraction, and complications were compared between the study groups. The mean follow-up was 83.3±46.1 and 63.3±45.6 months in the PK and DALK groups, respectively (P = .10). Postoperatively, BSCVA was 0.20±0.19 logMAR in the PK group and 0.26±0.19 logMAR in the DALK group (P = .11), with a BSCVA of ≥20/40 in 91.1% and 83.3% of eyes, respectively (P = .25). Two groups were comparable regarding postoperative refractive outcomes. Graft epitheliopathy and suture-associated complications were more commonly encountered after DALK, which was attributable to the effect of low-quality grafts on the clinical outcomes of DALK. Ten PK eyes (22.2%) and 9 DALK eyes (16.7%) experienced at least 1 episode of graft rejection within 5 years of corneal transplantation (P = .49). Rejection was reversible in 93.1% and 100% of episodes in the PK and DALK groups, respectively (P = .63). At the postoperative year 5, 95.6% of grafts in the PK group and 98.2% in the DALK group remained clear (P = .45). No significant difference was observed in the outcomes between PK and DALK in pediatric keratoconus. Low-quality donor tissues in DALK increased the incidence of graft epithelial problems and suture-related complications as compared to PK.