All-Inside PCL Reconstruction.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 33545733.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1055/s-0040-1722313.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Many different techniques with multiple graft types have been described for the reconstruction of the injured posterior cruciate ligament (PCL); autograft versus allograft, single- versus double-bundle, open inlay versus arthroscopic inlay versus arthroscopic transtibial, and recently described the arthroscopic "all-inside" socket technique. Reported clinical outcomes have demonstrated no significant difference in any of these PCL reconstruction techniques, likely because of the heterogeneity in injury characteristics and patient population. The ideal surgical technique should be safe, simple, and reproducible while allowing treatment of concomitant knee injuries resulting and return to function.
Medical subject headings
- Knee Injuries
- Posterior Cruciate Ligament
- Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
- Tendons
Anatomy
- femur
- knee
- tibia