Editorial Commentary: Augmented Bankart Could Be the Right Option for Subcritical Bone Loss.
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 33546805.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.10.027.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The suitable treatment for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with subcritical glenoid bone loss remains controversial. Although the Latarjet procedure is one of the most successful surgery for shoulder instability, it has been associated with potential complications in my patients with limited bone loss and poor soft-tissue conditions, which motivated me to further investigate Bankart augmentation techniques. A myriad of them have been devised and proposed for this specific group of patients; however, there are no sufficient clinical data reported in the literature to support one of them particularly or clarify in which situation they should be used. Further comparative and prospective studies are therefore needed to build an evidence-based decision tree to help us treating our patients and better match their expectations. That said, current literature and my experience have resulted in a shift in my treatment paradigm undertaken 3 years ago to augmented Bankart in case of subcritical glenoid bone loss.
Medical subject headings
- Bipolar Disorder
- Joint Instability
- Shoulder Dislocation
- Shoulder Joint
Anatomy
- shoulder