Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy of Intraocular Mass-Like Lesions.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 33609033.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa235.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy for intraocular mass-like lesions and its contributing factors. Intraocular FNA cases were retrieved and reviewed along with histopathologic follow-ups, if available. The effects of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), repeated biopsy, and adjunct immunocytochemical studies on cytologic diagnoses were analyzed. Of 72 FNA biopsies from 63 patients, nondiagnostic biopsy was seen in 17 cases (24%), whereas a definitive diagnosis was rendered in 39 cases (54%). The cytologic diagnoses correlated well with histopathologic follow-ups with a concordance rate of 61%. Almost all nondiagnostic biopsies (16/17, 94%) were seen in cases in which ROSE was not performed. Of the 7 patients in whom biopsy was repeated, a definitive diagnosis was rendered in 4 cases (57%). Immunocytochemistry was performed in the majority of cases with a malignant diagnosis, especially in metastatic tumors (75%). Our data demonstrates that FNA is an effective tool for the diagnosis of intraocular tumors. ROSE, repeated biopsy, and adjunct immunocytochemistry can help reduce the nondiagnostic rate and/or enhance diagnosis of malignancy, further improving FNA diagnostic performance.
Medical subject headings
- Biopsy, Fine-Needle
- Eye Neoplasms