Comparison of Surgical Results of the Bridge Crane Technique Versus Laminectomy for the Treatment of Thoracic Myelopathy Caused by Ossification of the Ligamentum Flavum.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 33685278.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/2192568221996689 and PMC identifier 9972286.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-ND.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
A retrospective study. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the bridge crane technique versus laminectomy for the treatment of thoracic myelopathy caused by ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF). Totally 41 patients who underwent surgical decompression due to thoracic OLF from May 2017 to June 2018 in our institution were enrolled in this study and were divided into group BG (bridge crane technique, n = 19) and group L (laminoectomy, n = 22). Demographic data was collected from medical records and the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring system was used to evaluate the neurological outcomes during the follow-up. Surgery-related complications were analyzed. The mean duration of follow-up was comparable between group BG (19.4 ± 1.5 months) and group L (19.6 ± 1.4 months). No statistical differences were observed between two groups in terms of gender, age, duration of symptoms, preoperative occupying rate, involved levels, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and complications. The JOA score significantly increased at the final follow-up in both groups. However, patients in group BG had higher JOA score and recovery rate (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Four patients in group L experienced complications, including 3 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and one postoperative hematoma. Only one patient in group BG had CSF leakage. The results of this study suggested that bridge crane technique may be relatively safe and effective for patients with symptomatic thoracic OLF with more satisfactory clinical improvement. However, high-quality studies are still required to validate the results of this study.
Anatomy
- thoracic spine