Birdsong fails to support object categorization in human infants.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 33705442.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0247430 and PMC identifier 7951872.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Recent evidence reveals a precocious link between language and cognition in human infants: listening to their native language supports infants' core cognitive processes, including object categorization, and does so in a way that other acoustic signals (e.g., time-reversed speech; sine-wave tone sequences) do not. Moreover, language is not the only signal that confers this cognitive advantage: listening to vocalizations of non-human primates also supports object categorization in 3- and 4-month-olds. Here, we move beyond primate vocalizations to clarify the breadth of acoustic signals that promote infant cognition. We ask whether listening to birdsong, another naturally produced animal vocalization, also supports object categorization in 3- and 4-month-old infants. We report that listening to zebra finch song failed to confer a cognitive advantage. This outcome brings us closer to identifying a boundary condition on the range of non-linguistic acoustic signals that initially support infant cognition.
Medical subject headings
- Acoustic Stimulation
- Child Development
- Cognition