Outcome Reporting in Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Abstract

Total ankle arthroplasty is an increasingly utilized treatment for ankle arthritis due to decreasing failure rates and improved outcomes. However, the literature on this procedure remains heterogeneous with large variability in outcome reporting methods. PRISMA guidelines were used to systematically review outcome reporting measures used in prospective studies and randomized control trials on total ankle arthroplasty published in 15 high-impact journals between Jan 1, 2009-May 1, 2020. A total of 43 studies were included and outcome measures were grouped into seven categories: pain, subjective function, patient satisfaction, complications, objective function, implant survivorship, and imaging. The most common topic of study was implant design followed by differences in outcomes when comparing total ankle arthroplasty and arthrodesis. The most commonly reported outcome measure was post-surgical complications. No study reported on all seven categories, while 22 (51.2%) studies reported on four or more. Subjective measures had significant variability with fifteen different Patient Reported Outcome Measures used across the studies. While the included studies were quite comprehensive, there was little consistency in reporting outcomes after total ankle arthroplasty. With improving outcomes and techniques in total ankle arthroplasty, and thus an expected increase in utilization and number of published studies, efforts should be made to use commonly employed outcome reporting methods to facilitate comparison of results across studies.