Time-demand, Radiation Exposure and Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery With the Use of Skin-Anchored Intraoperative Navigation: The Effect of the Learning Curve.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 33769982.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001167 and PMC identifier 11296386.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Retrospective review. The aim was to evaluate the learning curve of skin-anchored intraoperative navigation (ION) for minimally invasive lumbar surgery. ION is increasingly being utilized to provide better visualization, improve accuracy, and enable less invasive procedures. The use of noninvasive skin-anchored trackers for navigation is a novel technique, with the few reports on this technique demonstrating safety, feasibility, and significant reductions in radiation exposure compared with conventional fluoroscopy. However, a commonly cited deterrent to wider adoption is the learning curve. Retrospective review of patients undergoing 1-level minimally invasive lumbar surgery was performed. Outcomes were: (1) time for ION set-up and image-acquisition; (2) operative time; (3) fluoroscopy time; (4) radiation dose; (5) operative complications; (6) need for repeat spin; (7) incorrect localization.Chronologic case number was plotted against each outcome. Derivative of the nonlinear curve fit to the dataset for each outcome was solved to find plateau in learning. A total of 270 patients [114 microdiscectomy; 79 laminectomy; 77 minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF)] were included. (1) ION set-up and image-acquisition: no learning curve for microdiscectomy. Proficiency at 23 and 31 cases for laminectomy and MI-TLIF, respectively. (2) Operative time: no learning curve for microdiscectomy. Proficiency at 36 and 31 cases for laminectomy and MI-TLIF, respectively. (3) Fluoroscopy time: no learning curve. (4) Radiation dose: proficiency at 42 and 33 cases for microdiscectomy and laminectomy, respectively. No learning curve for MI-TLIF. (5) Operative complications: unable to evaluate for microdiscectomy and MI-TLIF. Proficiency at 29 cases for laminectomy. (6) Repeat spin: unable to evaluate for microdiscectomy and laminectomy. For MI-TLIF, chronology was not associated with repeat spins. (7) Incorrect localization: none. Skin-anchored ION did not result in any wrong level surgeries. Learning curve for other parameters varied by surgery type, but was achieved at 25-35 cases for a majority of outcomes. Level III.
Medical subject headings
- Radiation Exposure
- Spinal Fusion
Anatomy
- lumbar spine