The lockdown effect: A counterfactual for Sweden.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 33831093.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0249732 and PMC identifier 8031244.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
While most countries imposed a lockdown in response to the first wave of COVID-19 infections, Sweden did not. To quantify the lockdown effect, we approximate a counterfactual lockdown scenario for Sweden through the outcome in a synthetic control unit. We find, first, that a 9-week lockdown in the first half of 2020 would have reduced infections and deaths by about 75% and 38%, respectively. Second, the lockdown effect starts to materialize with a delay of 3-4 weeks only. Third, the actual adjustment of mobility patterns in Sweden suggests there has been substantial voluntary social restraint, although the adjustment was less strong than under the lockdown scenario. Lastly, we find that a lockdown would not have caused much additional output loss.
Medical subject headings
- COVID-19
- Models, Biological
- Quarantine
- SARS-CoV-2