Conducting a Scoping Review in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 33852490.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001763.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In the field of physical medicine and rehabilitation, there is a continuous need to conduct literature search in advancing evidence-based practice. In addition to the traditional meta-analysis approach, many clinicians have turned their attention to systematic reviews and scoping reviews for research evidence to support clinical practice. In this article, the authors aimed to (1) compare the similarities, differences, pros, and cons between a scoping review, a systematic review, and a meta-analysis and (2) summarize the fundamental stages in conducting a scoping review. Examples of recently published articles relevant to physical medicine and rehabilitation are presented to illustrate the concept and value of scoping reviews.
Medical subject headings
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Research Design