Six Meta-analyses on Treatments for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in a Year and Readers Are None the Wiser: Methods Advice for Researchers Planning Meta-analysis of Data From Fewer Than 5 Trials.
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 33930982.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2519/jospt.2021.0107.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In 2020, 6 meta-analyses comparing arthroscopic hip surgery to physical therapy were published. All included the same 3 randomized controlled trials, and none used methods suitable for the analysis of fewer than 5 studies. When there are fewer than 5 studies and heterogeneity, a random-effects model with the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman adjustment for a maximally conservative estimate should be employed; if reliable prior information is available, a Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis should be employed. Our re-analysis, which employed the appropriate model, found that there is currently insufficient evidence to conclude that surgery is superior to physical therapy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome. Further randomized controlled trials are required to resolve the clinical question of what the best treatment approach is for FAI syndrome. We provide readers with tools to conduct appropriate meta-analysis of fewer than 5 trials. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2021;51(5):201-203. doi:10.2519/jospt.2021.0107</i>.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroscopy
- Femoracetabular Impingement
- Meta-Analysis as Topic
- Physical Therapy Modalities
- Research Design
Anatomy
- hip