The Impact of Global Alignment and Proportion Score and Bracing on Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Adult Spinal Deformity.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 33977791.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/21925682211001812 and PMC identifier 10240591.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-ND.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Retrospective chart review. The goal of this study is to examine the relationship between global alignment and proportion (GAP) score and postoperative orthoses with likelihood of developing proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). Patients who underwent thoracic or lumbar fusions of ≥4 levels for adult spinal deformity (ASD) with 1-year post-operative alignment x-rays were included. Chart review was conducted to determine spinopelvic alignment parameters, PJK, and reoperation. A total of 81 patients were included; baseline and 1-year postoperative alignment did not differ between patients with and without PJK. There was no PJK in 53.1%, 29.6% had PJK from 10-20°, and 17.3% had severe PJK over 20° (sPJK). At baseline, 80% of patients had severely disproportioned GAP, 13.75% moderate, 6.25% proportioned. GAP improved across the population, but improved GAP was not associated with sPJK. Greater correction of the upper instrumented vertebra to pelvic angle (UIV-PA) was associated with a larger PJK angle (PJKA) change (R = -0.28) as was the 1 year T1-upper instrumented vertebra (T1-UIV) angle (R = 0.30), both <i>P</i> < .05. GAP change was not correlated with PJKA change. Postoperative orthoses were used in 46% of patients and did not impact sPJK. There was no correlation between PJK and GAP or change in GAP. Greater correction of UIV-PA and larger postop T1-UIV was associated with greater PJKA change; suggesting that the greater alignment correction led to greater likelihood of failure. Postoperative orthoses had no impact on PJK.