Anti-VEGF-resistant subretinal fluid is associated with better vision and reduced risk of macular atrophy.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 34039560.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318688 and PMC identifier 9606534.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To evaluate relationships between subretinal fluid (SRF), macular atrophy (MA) and visual outcomes in ranibizumab-treated neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). This post hoc HARBOR trial (NCT00891735) analysis included ranibizumab-treated (0.5 or 2.0 mg, monthly or as-needed, all treatment arms pooled) eyes with nAMD and baseline (screening, baseline and week 1) SRF. SRF presence, SRF thickness (0, >0-50, >50-100 and >100 µm) and subretinal fluid volume (SRFV) were determined by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed. MA was identified using fluorescein angiograms and colour fundus photographs, as well as SD-OCT. Seven hundred eighty-five of 1097 eyes met analysis criteria. In eyes without baseline MA, residual versus no SRF at month (M) 3 was associated with lower MA rates at M12 (5.1% vs 22.1%) and M24 (13.3% vs 31.2%) (both p<0.0001); MA percentages at M12/M24 were similar among patients with residual SRF at M6. Higher baseline SRFV was associated with a lower MA rate. Greater mean BCVA was observed with residual SRF of any thickness (>0-50 µm, 71.2 letters; >50-100 µm, 71.3 letters; >100 µm, 69.2 letters) versus no SRF (63.6 letters), but the change in BCVA from baseline to M12 or M24 was the same for eyes with or without treatment-resistant subretinal fluid (TR-SRF) at M3 or M6. TR-SRF was not detrimental to vision outcomes over 2 years, regardless of thickness. MA rates were significantly higher without TR-SRF.
Medical subject headings
- Subretinal Fluid
- Macular Degeneration