Comparison of Inline R2* MRI versus FerriScan for liver iron quantification in patients on chelation therapy for iron overload: preliminary results.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 34041571.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00330-021-08019-0.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
MRI quantification of liver iron concentration (LIC) using R<sub>2</sub> or R<sub>2</sub>* relaxometry requires offline post-processing causing reporting delays, administrative overhead, and added costs. A prototype 3D multi-gradient-echo pulse sequence, with inline post-processing, allows immediate calculation of LIC from an R<sub>2</sub>* map (inline R<sub>2</sub>*-LIC) without offline processing. We compared inline R<sub>2</sub>*-LIC to FerriScan and offline R<sub>2</sub>* calibration methods. Forty patients (25 women, 15 men; age 18-82 years), prospectively underwent FerriScan and the prototype sequence, which produces two R<sub>2</sub>* maps, with and without fat modeling, as well as an inline R<sub>2</sub>*-LIC map derived from the R<sub>2</sub>* map with fat modeling, with informed consent. For each map, the following contours were drawn: ROIs, whole-axial-liver contour, and an exact copy of contour utilized by FerriScan. LIC values from the FerriScan report and those calculated using an alternative R<sub>2</sub> calibration were the reference standards. Results were compared using Pearson and interclass correlation coefficients (PCC, ICC), linear regression, Bland-Altman analysis, and estimation of area under the receiver operator curve (ROC-AUC). Inline R<sub>2</sub>*-LIC demonstrated good agreement with the reference standards. Compared to FerriScan, inline R<sub>2</sub>*-LIC with whole-axial-liver contour, ROIs, and FerriScan contour demonstrated PCC of 94.8%, 94.8%, and 92%; ICC 93%, 92.7%, and 90.2%; regression slopes 1.004, 0.974, and 1.031; mean bias 5.54%, 10.91%, and 0.36%; and ROC-AUC estimates 0.903, 0.906, and 0.890 respectively. Agreement was maintained when adjusted for sex, age, diagnosis, liver fat content, and fat-water swap. Inline R<sub>2</sub>*-LIC provides robust and comparable quantification of LIC compared to FerriScan, without the need for offline post-processing. • In patients being treated for iron overload with chelation therapy, liver iron concentration (LIC) is regularly assessed in order to monitor and adjust therapy. • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used to quantify LIC. Several R<sub>2</sub> and R<sub>2</sub>* methods are available, all of which require offline post-processing. • A novel R<sub>2</sub>* MRI method allows for immediate calculation of LIC and provides comparable quantification of LIC to the FerriScan and recently published alternative R<sub>2</sub>* methods.
Medical subject headings
- Iron
- Iron Overload