The active role of interpreters in medical discourse - An observational study in emergency medicine.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 34052053.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2021.05.029.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To study communicative tasks executed and related strategies used by patients, health professionals, and medical interpreters. English proficient and limited English proficient emergency department patients were observed. The content of patient-hospital staff communication was documented via pen and paper. Key themes and differences across interpreter types were established through qualitative analysis. Themes and differences across interpreter type were vetted and updated through member checking interviews. 6 English proficient and 9 limited English proficient patients were observed. Key themes in communicative tasks included: establishing, maintaining, updating, and repairing understanding and rapport. All tasks were observed with English proficient and limited English proficient patients. The difference with limited English proficient patients was that medical interpreters played an active role in completing communicative tasks. Telephone-based interpreters faced challenges in facilitating communicative tasks based on thematic comparisons with in-person interpreters, including issues hearing and lost information due to the lack of visual cues. Professional interpreters play an important role in communication between language discordant patients and health professionals that goes beyond verbatim translation. Training for interpreters and health professionals, and the design of tools for facilitating language discordant communication, should consider the role of interpreters beyond verbatim translation.
Medical subject headings
- Emergency Medicine
- Limited English Proficiency