Social Accountability and Graduate Medical Education.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 34086288.
- Also identified by DOI 10.22454/FamMed.2021.160888.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Because graduate medical education (GME) is largely publicly funded, it should be judged on how well it addresses the public's health needs. However, the current system distributes GME resources inequitably by specialty and geography, and neglects to focus on training physicians adequately in the care of populations while reducing health disparities. Instead, GME continues to concentrate training in hospital-based academic centers and in subspecialties, which often exacerbates disparities in health outcomes and access to care. GME can be more socially accountable by shifting incentive structures to support primary care, creating more equitable distribution of residency slots and funding, and promoting training programs that focus on social and structural determinants of health.