Efficacy of Wolbachia-Infected Mosquito Deployments for the Control of Dengue.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 34107180.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa2030243 and PMC identifier 8103655.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
<i>Aedes aegypti</i> mosquitoes infected with the <i>w</i>Mel strain of <i>Wolbachia pipientis</i> are less susceptible than wild-type <i>A. aegypti</i> to dengue virus infection. We conducted a cluster-randomized trial involving releases of <i>w</i>Mel-infected <i>A. aegypti</i> mosquitoes for the control of dengue in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. We randomly assigned 12 geographic clusters to receive deployments of <i>w</i>Mel-infected <i>A. aegypti</i> (intervention clusters) and 12 clusters to receive no deployments (control clusters). All clusters practiced local mosquito-control measures as usual. A test-negative design was used to assess the efficacy of the intervention. Patients with acute undifferentiated fever who presented to local primary care clinics and were 3 to 45 years of age were recruited. Laboratory testing was used to identify participants who had virologically confirmed dengue (VCD) and those who were test-negative controls. The primary end point was symptomatic VCD of any severity caused by any dengue virus serotype. After successful introgression of <i>w</i>Mel into the intervention clusters, 8144 participants were enrolled; 3721 lived in intervention clusters, and 4423 lived in control clusters. In the intention-to-treat analysis, VCD occurred in 67 of 2905 participants (2.3%) in the intervention clusters and in 318 of 3401 (9.4%) in the control clusters (aggregate odds ratio for VCD, 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15 to 0.35; P = 0.004). The protective efficacy of the intervention was 77.1% (95% CI, 65.3 to 84.9) and was similar against the four dengue virus serotypes. The incidence of hospitalization for VCD was lower among participants who lived in intervention clusters (13 of 2905 participants [0.4%]) than among those who lived in control clusters (102 of 3401 [3.0%]) (protective efficacy, 86.2%; 95% CI, 66.2 to 94.3). Introgression of <i>w</i>Mel into <i>A. aegypti</i> populations was effective in reducing the incidence of symptomatic dengue and resulted in fewer hospitalizations for dengue among the participants. (Funded by the Tahija Foundation and others; AWED ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03055585; Indonesia Registry number, INA-A7OB6TW.).
Medical subject headings
- Aedes
- Communicable Disease Control
- Dengue
- Mosquito Vectors
- Wolbachia