A comparison of intramedullary cannulated screws versus miniplates for fixation of unstable metacarpal diaphyseal fractures.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 34107786.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/17531934211021521.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We carried out a prospective randomized study to compare the clinical and radiological results of metacarpal diaphyseal fractures treated with retrograde intramedullary headless cannulated screws (IHCS) and plates. Fractures were fixed with IHCS in 34 patients (37 metacarpals) and locked miniplates in 35 patients (40 metacarpals). The mean age was 33 years (range 18-61) in the IHCS group and 32 years (range 17-68) in plate group. All patients were followed up for 1 year. All fractures in the IHCS group united but there was one nonunion in the plate group. At final follow-up, there was no significant difference between the groups in total active movement, visual analogue pain score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score and grip strength, although the study was not sufficiently powered to exclude differences with certainty. IHCS is a safe and fast technique that is a good alternative to plate fixation in metacarpal diaphyseal fractures.<b>Level of evidence:</b> I.
Medical subject headings
- Fractures, Bone
- Metacarpal Bones
Anatomy
- hand