Characterizing the Clinical Features and Atrophy Patterns of <i>MAPT</i>-Related Frontotemporal Dementia With Disease Progression Modeling.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 34158384.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012410 and PMC identifier 8408507.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
Mutations in the <i>MAPT</i> gene cause frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Most previous studies investigating the neuroanatomical signature of <i>MAPT</i> mutations have grouped all different mutations together and shown an association with focal atrophy of the temporal lobe. The variability in atrophy patterns between each particular <i>MAPT</i> mutation is less well-characterized. We aimed to investigate whether there were distinct groups of <i>MAPT</i> mutation carriers based on their neuroanatomical signature. We applied Subtype and Stage Inference (SuStaIn), an unsupervised machine learning technique that identifies groups of individuals with distinct progression patterns, to characterize patterns of regional atrophy in <i>MAPT-</i>associated FTD within the Genetic FTD Initiative (GENFI) cohort study. Eighty-two <i>MAPT</i> mutation carriers were analyzed, the majority of whom had P301L, IVS10+16, or R406W mutations, along with 48 healthy noncarriers. SuStaIn identified 2 groups of <i>MAPT</i> mutation carriers with distinct atrophy patterns: a temporal subtype, in which atrophy was most prominent in the hippocampus, amygdala, temporal cortex, and insula; and a frontotemporal subtype, in which atrophy was more localized to the lateral temporal lobe and anterior insula, as well as the orbitofrontal and ventromedial prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate. There was one-to-one mapping between IVS10+16 and R406W mutations and the temporal subtype and near one-to-one mapping between P301L mutations and the frontotemporal subtype. There were differences in clinical symptoms and neuropsychological test scores between subtypes: the temporal subtype was associated with amnestic symptoms, whereas the frontotemporal subtype was associated with executive dysfunction. Our results demonstrate that different <i>MAPT</i> mutations give rise to distinct atrophy patterns and clinical phenotype, providing insights into the underlying disease biology and potential utility for patient stratification in therapeutic trials.
Medical subject headings
- Frontotemporal Dementia
- Machine Learning
- tau Proteins