Unsplit superconducting and time reversal symmetry breaking transitions in Sr<sub>2</sub>RuO<sub>4</sub> under hydrostatic pressure and disorder.

Grinenko, Vadim; Das, Debarchan; Gupta, Ritu; Zinkl, Bastian; Kikugawa, Naoki; Maeno, Yoshiteru; Hicks, Clifford W; Klauss, Hans-Henning et al. · Nat Commun · 2021

basic_science · Level V

Where this comes from

Abstract

There is considerable evidence that the superconducting state of Sr<sub>2</sub>RuO<sub>4</sub> breaks time reversal symmetry. In the experiments showing time reversal symmetry breaking, its onset temperature, T<sub>TRSB</sub>, is generally found to match the critical temperature, T<sub>c</sub>, within resolution. In combination with evidence for even parity, this result has led to consideration of a d<sub>xz</sub> ± id<sub>yz</sub> order parameter. The degeneracy of the two components of this order parameter is protected by symmetry, yielding T<sub>TRSB</sub> = T<sub>c</sub>, but it has a hard-to-explain horizontal line node at k<sub>z</sub> = 0. Therefore, s ± id and d ± ig order parameters are also under consideration. These avoid the horizontal line node, but require tuning to obtain T<sub>TRSB</sub> ≈ T<sub>c</sub>. To obtain evidence distinguishing these two possible scenarios (of symmetry-protected versus accidental degeneracy), we employ zero-field muon spin rotation/relaxation to study pure Sr<sub>2</sub>RuO<sub>4</sub> under hydrostatic pressure, and Sr<sub>1.98</sub>La<sub>0.02</sub>RuO<sub>4</sub> at zero pressure. Both hydrostatic pressure and La substitution alter T<sub>c</sub> without lifting the tetragonal lattice symmetry, so if the degeneracy is symmetry-protected, T<sub>TRSB</sub> should track changes in T<sub>c</sub>, while if it is accidental, these transition temperatures should generally separate. We observe T<sub>TRSB</sub> to track T<sub>c</sub>, supporting the hypothesis of d<sub>xz</sub> ± id<sub>yz</sub> order.