The Chinese version of OPTION scale: Is it reliable on measuring the shared decision-making among preoperative conversations.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 34183218.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2021.04.012.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To test the reliability of the Chinese version of the OPTION<sup>12</sup> (OPTION<sup>12</sup>-C) scale; and to evaluate the level of shared decision-making (SDM) in the preoperative conversations for high-risk procedures by using the OPTION<sup>12</sup>-C. Two hundred and ninety-seven conversations were rated. Cronbach's alpha, Pearson's correlation coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to assess the reliability of the OPTION<sup>12</sup>-C. Mean and median were applied to evaluate the scores. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.603. The Pearson's correlation coefficient of the sub-items ranged from 0.002 to 0.595; the inter-rater ICC was 0.992. The mean and median of the total scores were 9.61 ( ± 3.583) and 9 respectively. 430 family members appeared in the conversations. The reliability of the OPTION<sup>12</sup>-C was acceptable. The SDM behaviors of doctors were only scored at or close to the minimal skill level. High level of family involvement demonstrated the Chinese culture of family- centeredness. The OPTION<sup>12</sup>-C was proved to be applicable for testing the extent of SDM. The low level of SDM indicates a need to improve Chinese doctors' communication skills.
Medical subject headings
- Decision Making
- Patient Participation