FEF<sub>25-75</sub>% Is a More Sensitive Measure Reflecting Airway Dysfunction in Patients with Asthma: A Comparison Study Using FEF<sub>25-75</sub>% and FEV<sub>1</sub>.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 34214706.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.06.027.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Reduced forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity percent predicted (FEF<sub>25-75</sub>%) representing small airway dysfunction (SAD) was associated with asthma development and progression. To investigate whether FEF<sub>25-75</sub>% was superior to forced expiratory volume in 1 second in predicted (FEV<sub>1</sub>%) in reflecting asthma features in adult patients. A retrospective spirometry dataset comprising 1801 adult patients with confirmed asthma and a subgroup of 332 patients having detailed clinical data were used to explore the association of FEF<sub>25-75</sub>% and/or FEV<sub>1</sub>% with clinical features of asthma. Of the 1801 subjects, FEV<sub>1</sub>% and FEF<sub>25-75</sub>% ranged from 136.8% to 10.2% and 127.3% to 3.1%, respectively. FEF<sub>25-75</sub>% < 65% was present in 1,478 (82.07%) of patients. FEF<sub>25-75</sub>% was strongly correlated with matched FEV<sub>1</sub>% (r = 0.900, P < .001). FEF<sub>25-75</sub>% and FEV<sub>1</sub>% were both correlated with airway hyperresponsiveness (r = 0.436, P < .001; r = 0.367, P < .001), asthma control test score (r = 0.329, P < .001; r = 0.335, P < .001), and sputum eosinophil count (r = -0.306, P < .001; r = -0.307, P < .001). Receiver-operating characteristic curves showed that FEF<sub>25-75</sub>% had greater value in predicting severe asthma (area under the curve: 0.84 vs 0.81, P = .018), airflow obstruction (0.97 vs 0.89, P < .001), and severe bronchial hyperresponsiveness (0.74 vs 0.69, P = .012) as compared with FEV<sub>1</sub>%. Patients with SAD (FEF<sub>25-75</sub>% < 65%) in the presence of normal FEV<sub>1</sub>% exhibited higher sputum eosinophil counts and had an increased dosage of daily inhaled corticosteroids (P < .001 and P = .010) than patients with normal lung function and their FEF<sub>25-75</sub>% values correlated with sputum eosinophil count (r = -0.419, P = .015), but not FEV<sub>1</sub>%. FEF<sub>25-75</sub>% represented small airway function and was more sensitive at reflecting airway hyperresponsiveness, inflammation, and disease severity as compared with FEV<sub>1</sub>% in patients with asthma. Our data suggest further assessment of FEF<sub>25-75</sub>% in asthma management, particularly for those with SAD who present normal FEV<sub>1</sub>%.
Medical subject headings
- Asthma
- Bronchial Hyperreactivity