Systematic Versus Lobe-Specific Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy for Hypermetabolic Lung Cancer.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal extent of lymph node dissection (LND) for hypermetabolic tumors that are associated with high rates of nodal disease, recurrence, or mortality has not been elucidated. METHODS: We reviewed 375 patients who underwent lobectomy with lymphadenectomy for clinical T2-3 N0-1 M0 hypermetabolic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) ≥ 6.60] via a multicenter database. Extent of LND was classified into systematic mediastinal LND (systematic LND) and lobe-specific mediastinal LND (lobe-specific LND). Postoperative outcomes after lobectomy with systematic LND (n = 128) and lobe-specific LND (n = 247) were analyzed for all patients and their propensity-score-matched pairs. RESULTS: Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and recurrence-free interval (RFI) of the systematic LND group were not significantly different from those of the lobe-specific LND group in the nonadjusted whole cohort. In the propensity-score-matched cohort (101 pairs), systematic LND dissected significantly more lymph nodes (20.0 versus 16.0 nodes, P = 0.0057) and detected lymph node metastasis more frequently (53.5% vs. 33.7%, P = 0.0069). Six (5.9%) patients in the systematic LND group had a metastatic N2 lymph node "in the systematic LND field" that lobe-specific LND could not dissect. The systematic LND group tended to have better prognosis than the lobe-specific LND group (5-year CSS rates, 82.6% versus 69.6%; 5-year RFI rates, 56.6% vs. 47.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Systematic LND was found to harvest more metastatic lymph nodes and provide better oncological outcome than lobe-specific LND in a cohort of hypermetabolic NSCLC patients.