Cascaded Algorithm Selection With Extreme-Region UCB Bandit.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 34232866.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3094844.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
AutoML aims at best configuring learning systems automatically. It contains core subtasks of algorithm selection and hyper-parameter tuning. Previous approaches considered searching in the joint hyper-parameter space of all algorithms, which forms a huge but redundant space and causes an inefficient search. We tackle this issue in a cascaded algorithm selection way, which contains an upper-level process of algorithm selection and a lower-level process of hyper-parameter tuning for algorithms. While the lower-level process employs an anytime tuning approach, the upper-level process is naturally formulated as a multi-armed bandit, deciding which algorithm should be allocated one more piece of time for the lower-level tuning. To achieve the goal of finding the best configuration, we propose the Extreme-Region Upper Confidence Bound (ER-UCB) strategy. Unlike UCB bandits that maximize the mean of feedback distribution, ER-UCB maximizes the extreme-region of feedback distribution. We first consider stationary distributions and propose the ER-UCB-S algorithm that has O(Klnn) regret upper bound with K arms and n trials. We then extend to non-stationary settings and propose the ER-UCB-N algorithm that has O(Kn<sup>ν</sup>) regret upper bound, where [Formula: see text]. Finally, empirical studies on synthetic and AutoML tasks verify the effectiveness of ER-UCB-S/N by their outperformance in corresponding settings.