Letters of recommendation: Nuanced bias or useful affirmation?
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 34303456.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.03.050.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Narrative letters of recommendation (NLORs) have become key elements of the application process for residency and fellowship. The potential to inadvertently admit bias into these subjective narratives has become an area of research focus across many disciplines. In the present review, we have highlighted the current data regarding bias in NLORs. We also believe that one of the most effective methods to eliminate bias from written recommendations is to first understand that it exists. Thus, the objective measures that have been taken to identify bias in NLORs are important steps in the right direction. We have presented and reflected on the accrued data on bias in NLORs pertaining to surgical training.
Medical subject headings
- Correspondence as Topic
- Education, Medical, Graduate
- Fellowships and Scholarships
- Internship and Residency
- Personnel Selection
- Physicians, Women
- Prejudice
- School Admission Criteria
- Social Discrimination
- Surgeons